Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 453
Filtrar
1.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ; 12: 784706, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34899614

RESUMO

Background: Adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) is widely used in adrenal vein sampling (AVS) and can be administered as a bolus injection or continuous infusion. The optimal administration method has not been determined. We aimed to compare the effects of ACTH bolus with infusion on cannulation success, lateralization assessment and adverse events (AEs). Methods: Retrospectively collected data from patients with primary aldosteronism who underwent AVS with ACTH at a tertiary hospital in China. Rate of successful cannulation, lateralization index (LI), complete biochemical remission and AEs related to AVS were analyzed. Results: The study included 80 patients receiving ACTH bolus and 94 receiving infusions. The rate of successful cannulation was comparable between bolus and infusion groups (75/80, 93.4% vs 88/94, 93.6%). In those with successful cannulation, the bolus group had a higher selectivity index than the infusion group, while LI [6.4(1.8-17.5) vs. 7.6(2.0-27.8), P=0.48] and rate of complete biochemical remission (43/44, 97.7% vs 53/53, 100%, P=0.45) did not significantly differ between the two groups. One in the bolus and one patient in the infusion group had adrenal vein rupture but they recovered with conservative treatment. The bolus group reported more transient AEs such as palpitation (52.9% vs 2.2%) and abdominal discomfort (40.0% vs 2.2%) than the infusion group. Conclusions: Due to their similar effects on cannulation success and lateralization, but a lower rate of transient AEs in the infusion group, the continuous infusion method should be recommended for ACTH stimulation in AVS.


Assuntos
Glândulas Suprarrenais/irrigação sanguínea , Hormônio Adrenocorticotrópico/administração & dosagem , Coleta de Amostras Sanguíneas/métodos , Hiperaldosteronismo/sangue , Glândulas Suprarrenais/efeitos dos fármacos , Adulto , Coleta de Amostras Sanguíneas/normas , Cateterismo/métodos , Cateterismo/normas , Feminino , Humanos , Hiperaldosteronismo/tratamento farmacológico , Infusões Intravenosas , Injeções Intravenosas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Turk J Gastroenterol ; 32(1): 1-10, 2021 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33893761

RESUMO

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is technically demanding and carries significant risks. It is performed by gastrointestinal and surgical endoscopists. There is no consensus on the minimum number of ERCPs required during training. This study was conducted to analyze the minimum number of clinical ERCPs that a trainee needs to perform to achieve competency. PubMed, Ovid-Embase, and the Cochrane library were searched systematically for prospective and retrospective studies reporting on trainees' ERCP performance. Mete-analysis was conducted to analyze the success rate of cannulation, other basic techniques, and adverse event rate, using the random-effect model with Review Manager 5.3. Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria, with 149 trainees performing a total of 18 794 ERCP procedures. The pooled cannulation success rate was 85.7% (95% CI: 78.1%-91.0%) at completion of training. The cannulation success rate was 76.5% (95% CI: 69.2%-82.5%) when the trainees had completed 180 ERCPs, which increased to 81.8% (95% CI: 69.8%-90.6%) after 200 ERCP procedures. Adverse events and post-ERCP pancreatitis rates were 4.7% (95% CI: 2.9%-9.1%) and 2.0% (0.9%-3.9%), respectively. Achieving a cannulation success rate of >90% was considered a quality indicator for ERCP training by most societal guidelines. However, our retrospective analysis indicated that trainees only attained a pooled cannulation success rate of only 81.8% after 200 procedures. Therefore, the minimum number of ERCPs required to achieve competency during training may need to be redefined to meet the basic requirement.


Assuntos
Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Competência Clínica , Gastroenterologia , Cateterismo/normas , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/efeitos adversos , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/normas , Competência Clínica/normas , Endoscopia do Sistema Digestório/educação , Endoscopia do Sistema Digestório/normas , Gastroenterologia/educação , Gastroenterologia/normas , Humanos , Curva de Aprendizado
3.
J Surg Res ; 264: 16-19, 2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33744773

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although literature is sparse, there are guidelines regarding optimal placement technique for peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheters in the pediatric population. Through this study, we sought to identify commonly used techniques among pediatric surgeons and identify areas for future work. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 16-question anonymous survey was emailed to American Pediatric Surgery Association members in September 2018 regarding routine practices for PD catheter placement. Descriptive statistics and Fisher's exact test were used for analysis. RESULTS: In all, there were 221 respondents, 6.8% of whom did not place PD catheters in their practice. Of the remaining 206, the majority have been in practice >15 y. PD catheter placement during fellowship training varied widely, with 6.5% reporting no fellowship experience to 6% reporting >25 placed during fellowship. Almost half (48%) reported placing catheters via laparoscopic approach (versus open or combined approach). Most (62%) respondents reported an annual practice volume of 1-5 catheters, with only 11% placing >10 per year. Exit-site sutures were placed "always" by 33% of participants and "never" by 49% of participants. There was no association between years in practice or fellowship experience and exit-site suture placement. However, there was a trend for "never" placement (72%) with more recent graduates. Omentectomy was performed by 91% of respondents, whereas 8.3% reported never performing omentectomy/omentopexy. Similarly, there was no association between practice and fellowship experience and omentectomy. In the setting of abdominal stoma, 96% reported placing the exit site on the opposite side of the abdomen. Fibrin glue was used along the tunnel by 21% of participants, ranging from "always" to "sometimes", whereas 79% "never" used it. CONCLUSIONS: Fellowship, posttraining experience, and techniques in PD catheter placement vary widely among American Pediatric Surgery Association member respondents. Despite guidelines, practices differ among providers without an association between the number of cases performed in fellowship and postfellowship volume.


Assuntos
Cateterismo/estatística & dados numéricos , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Diálise Peritoneal/instrumentação , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Cateterismo/normas , Cateteres de Demora , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Competência Clínica/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Internato e Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Omento/cirurgia , Diálise Peritoneal/normas , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Cirurgiões/educação , Cirurgiões/normas , Cirurgiões/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários/estatística & dados numéricos
5.
J Vasc Access ; 22(3): 450-456, 2021 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32648805

RESUMO

Cannulation is essential for haemodialysis with arteriovenous access, but also damages the arteriovenous access making it prone to failure, is associated with complications and affects patients' experiences of haemodialysis. Managing Access by Generating Improvements in Cannulation is a national UK quality improvement project, designed to improve cannulation practice in the United Kingdom, ensuring it reflects current needling recommendations. It uses a simple quality improvement method, the Model for Improvement, to structure improvement to cannulation practice. It assists units in the practical implementation of the British Renal Society and Vascular Access Society of Britain and Ireland needling recommendations, ensuring actual cannulation practice reflects what is defined as best practice in cannulation. An eLearning package and awareness materials have been developed, to assist units in changing their cannulation practice. The Kidney Quality Improvement Partnership provides a structure for Managing Access by Generating Improvements in Cannulation that promotes development and dissemination. It is hoped that Managing Access by Generating Improvements in Cannulation will raise an understanding about the cannulation of arteriovenous access and change behaviours and beliefs around correct cannulation practice, to ensure longevity of this lifeline.


Assuntos
Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/normas , Implante de Prótese Vascular/normas , Cateterismo/normas , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Melhoria de Qualidade/normas , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/normas , Diálise Renal/normas , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Benchmarking/normas , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo/efeitos adversos , Competência Clínica/normas , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Capacitação em Serviço/normas , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Reino Unido
6.
Adv Chronic Kidney Dis ; 27(4): 344-349.e1, 2020 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33131648

RESUMO

The nephrologist has a pivotal role as the leader of multidisciplinary teams to optimize vascular access care of the patient on dialysis and to promote multidisciplinary collaboration in research, training, and education. The continued success of interventional nephrology as an independent discipline depends on harnessing these efforts to advance knowledge and encourage innovation. A comprehensive curriculum that encompasses research from bench to bedside coupled with standardized clinical training protocols are fundamental to this expansion. As we find ourselves on the threshold of a much-awaited revolution in nephrology, there is great opportunity but also formidable challenges in the field - it is up to us to work together to realize the enormous potential of our discipline.


Assuntos
Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica , Cateterismo , Nefrologistas , Nefrologia/educação , Papel do Médico , Diálise Renal , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/normas , Cateterismo/normas , Cateteres de Demora , Certificação , Fluoroscopia , Humanos , Rim/diagnóstico por imagem , Laparoscopia , Nefrologistas/normas , Nefrologia/normas , Nefrologia/tendências , Diálise Peritoneal , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Ultrassonografia
7.
Intern Med ; 59(14): 1687-1693, 2020 Jul 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32296000

RESUMO

Objective We investigated the results of biliary cannulation using a short-type single-balloon enteroscope in patients with a native papilla who had previously undergone Roux-en-Y gastrectomy and analyzed the factors associated with successful cannulation. Methods The study subjects consisted of patients with a native papilla who had previously undergone Roux-en-Y gastrectomy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography using a short-type single-balloon enteroscope at our institution between September 2011 and July 2019. We carried out a retrospective investigation of the outcomes, including assessing the success rate of biliary cannulation, and analyzed the factors associated with successful cannulation. Results In total, 78 patients underwent biliary cannulation of a native papilla. The success rate of biliary cannulation was 80.8% (88.5% when including success on repeated attempts). The success rate of the standard cannulation technique was 60.3%, with the use of advanced cannulation techniques to secure the pancreatic duct providing the same additional effect as a normal anatomy. Adverse events occurred in 9.0% of cases. A multivariate analysis of the Roux-en-Y gastrectomy patients found that cannulation was more likely to be successful in patients in whom the scope could be placed in the retroflex position (odds ratio: 7.88, 95% confidence interval: 2.19-37.77, p<0.001). Conclusion Selective biliary cannulation using a short-type single-balloon enteroscope in patients with a native papilla who had undergone Roux-en-Y gastrectomy was effective and safe. The retroflex position provided a good papilla field of view and improved the success rate of biliary cannulation.


Assuntos
Anastomose em-Y de Roux/efeitos adversos , Enteroscopia de Balão/normas , Sistema Biliar , Cateterismo/normas , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/efeitos adversos , Gastrectomia/normas , Ductos Pancreáticos/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Estudos Retrospectivos
8.
Intern Emerg Med ; 15(6): 1075-1079, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32133576

RESUMO

Gastrostomy tubes (G-tubes) are frequently used in children for feeding and nutrition. Complications related to G-tubes (and G-buttons) in children represent a common presentation to the emergency department (ED). G-tube replacement is usually performed by pediatric emergency medicine physicians. Misplacement may lead to tract disruption, perforation, fistula tract formation, or feeding into the peritoneum. Contrast-enhanced radiographs are traditionally used for confirmation. In addition to a longer length-of-stay, repeat ED visits result in repeated radiation exposure. The use of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) instead of radiography avoids this exposure to ionizing radiation. Here, we describe three patients who presented with G-tube complications in whom POCUS alone performed by pediatricians was used for confirmation of the tubes' replacement. Two children presented to the ED with G-tube dislodgement, and one child presented with a ruptured balloon. In all three cases, a new G-tube was replaced at the bedside using POCUS guidance without the need for further radiographic studies. There were no known ED or clinic returns for G-tube complaints over the next 30 days. This is the first report of pediatricians using POCUS to guide and confirm G-tube replacement in children. The success of these cases suggests the technique's feasibility. Future prospective studies are needed to evaluate the learning curves, diagnostic accuracy, ED length-of-stay, and use of confirmatory imaging.


Assuntos
Cateterismo/normas , Gastrostomia/instrumentação , Ultrassonografia/métodos , Cateterismo/estatística & dados numéricos , Pré-Escolar , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Gastrostomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Medicina de Emergência Pediátrica/instrumentação , Medicina de Emergência Pediátrica/métodos , Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito/normas , Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ultrassonografia/estatística & dados numéricos
9.
Kidney Blood Press Res ; 44(6): 1383-1391, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31618744

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Unplanned start of renal replacement therapy is common in patients with end-stage renal disease and often accomplished by hemodialysis (HD) using a central venous catheter (CVC). Urgent start using peritoneal dialysis (PD) could be an alternative for some of the patients; however, this requires a hospital-based PD center that offers a structured urgent start PD (usPD) program. METHODS: In this prospective study, we describe the implementation of an usPD program at our university hospital by structuring the process from presentation to PD catheter implantation and start of PD within a few days. For clinical validation, we compared the patient flow before (2013-2015) and after (2016-2018) availability of usPD. RESULTS: In the 3 years before the availability of usPD, 14% (n = 12) of incident PD patients (n = 87) presented in an unplanned situation and were initially treated with HD using a CVC. In the 3 years after implementation of the usPD program, 18% (n = 18) of all incident PD patients (n = 103) presented in an unplanned situation of whom n = 12 (12%) were treated with usPD and n = 6 (6%) with initial HD. usPD significantly reduced the use of HD by 57% (p = 0.0005). Hospital stay was similar in patients treated with usPD (median 9 days) compared to those with elective PD (8 days), and significantly lower than in patients with initial HD (26 days, p = 0.0056). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of an usPD program reduces HD catheter use and hospital stay in the unplanned situation.


Assuntos
Cateteres Venosos Centrais , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Tempo de Internação , Diálise Peritoneal/métodos , Diálise Renal , Cateterismo/métodos , Cateterismo/normas , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Diálise Peritoneal/normas , Estudos Prospectivos , Diálise Renal/instrumentação
10.
J Emerg Med ; 57(6): 852-858, 2019 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31635927

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Commonly used ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein (IJV) cannulation techniques, short axis out of plane and long axis in-plane, have significantly reduced complications but failed to eliminate them because of technical difficulties. OBJECTIVE: This article describes a new anteroposterior short axis in-plane technique that combines advantage of in-plane technique to track the needle tip and short axis view of visualizing nearby anatomical structures by placing the probe on the side of the neck, oriented anteroposteriorly, perpendicular to the long axis of neck. This view visualizes IJV and its relationship to the carotid artery in short axis. The puncture needle is passed in-plane anteroposteriorly from the anterior aspect of the neck. Visualizing the needle, carotid artery, and IJV in single frame minimizes complications. METHODS: A prospective evaluative clinical trial was conducted in patients who require IJV cannulation for various reasons by performers experienced in ultrasound-guided IJV cannulations. The efficacy of the technique is indicated by 3 primary outcome measures: access time, number of attempts and success rate, and safety by secondary outcome measure, which is the incidence of mechanical complications. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients were enrolled. The average number of attempts was 1.17 (standard deviation 0.44), the access time was 27.12 s (standard deviation 21.47), and the success rate was 100%. This technique had 12% incidence of posterior venous wall punctures and 2.66% misplacements and no other complications. CONCLUSION: Anteroposterior short axis in-plane technique is relatively novel and could be alternatively used safely and effectively in place of existing techniques for IJV cannulation.


Assuntos
Cateterismo/métodos , Veias Jugulares/anatomia & histologia , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/métodos , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/normas , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cateterismo/normas , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/normas , Feminino , Humanos , Veias Jugulares/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/estatística & dados numéricos
13.
J Ren Care ; 45(4): 232-238, 2019 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31448871

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Arteriovenous dialysis access, fistulae (AVF) or grafts (AVG), are associated with significant rates of thrombosis. Timely thrombectomy may have a significant impact on immediate and long-term access survival. However, switching to a catheter is associated with higher rates of morbidity and mortality compared with those who have an AVF or AVG. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to evaluate whether time to thrombectomy increases the risk for loss of dialysis access and subsequent placement of a dialysis catheter at hospital discharge, at 6 months, 12 months, and data at any time after discharge. METHODS: Using retrospective data, 444 patients were identified as having undergone thrombectomy for dialysis access dysfunction between January 2008 and April 2015, with 122 hospital admissions primarily for thrombectomy. RESULTS: The mean age was 60.4 years, 65% were male, and 44.3% had an arteriovenous fistula as their dialysis access. The mean time to thrombectomy was 10.8 hours, and 14 patients utilised a catheter for haemodialysis as primary access upon discharge. After adjustment for prior access intervention, access type, and time to thrombectomy, the adjusted odds ratios (AOR) of a one-day delay in thrombectomy was associated with a twofold increase in requirement for catheter at discharge and at 6 months. This association remained present at any time after discharge. CONCLUSION: In this study of patients cared for within an academic health system, a single day delay in thrombectomy nearly doubled the risk of needing a dialysis catheter at hospital discharge, 6 months, or any time after discharge.


Assuntos
Cateterismo/normas , Cateteres de Demora/efeitos adversos , Trombectomia/normas , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto , Idoso , Fístula Arteriovenosa , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Diálise Renal/instrumentação , Diálise Renal/métodos , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/complicações , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Trombectomia/classificação , Resultado do Tratamento
14.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 31(10): 1200-1205, 2019 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31464778

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: In European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines, biliary cannulation of native papilla is defined as difficult in the presence of >5 papilla contacts, >5 min cannulation time or >1 unintended pancreatic duct cannulation (5-5-2). The aim is to test 5-5-2-criteria in a single-center practice predicting the risk of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP), and to study the efficacy of transpancreatic biliary sphincterotomy (TPBS) as an advanced method for biliary cannulation. METHODS: Prospectively collected data of 821 patients with native papilla were analyzed. Primary cannulation was the first method chosen for cannulation (sphincterotome and a guidewire). Advanced cannulation method was endoscopist-chosen cannulation method after failed primary cannulation. RESULTS: Primary cannulation succeeded in 599 (73%) patients in a median of 2 min. TPBS ± needle knife resulted in a 90% success rate. The final cannulation success was 814 (99.1%) cases in a median of 5.3 min. PEP risk was 4.0%. When primary cannulation succeeded, the PEP rate was 2.3%. When advanced methods were needed, the PEP rate increased to 13.5%. Altogether 311 (37.9%) patients fulfilled at least one 5-5-2-criterion. In patients without 5-5-2-criteria, the primary cannulation succeeded in 79.6% (n = 477), compared to 20.4% (n = 122) with the criteria, P < 0.001, indicating the need to exchange the cannulation method instead of persistence. If all the 5-5-2-criteria were present, the risk of PEP was 12.7%. CONCLUSION: The results support the use of the 5-5-2-criteria for difficult cannulation. TPBS is an effective advanced cannulation method with an acceptable complication rate.


Assuntos
Ampola Hepatopancreática/cirurgia , Cateterismo/normas , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/normas , Pancreatite/prevenção & controle , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Esfinterotomia Endoscópica/normas , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Ampola Hepatopancreática/diagnóstico por imagem , Cateterismo/métodos , Criança , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Pancreatite/epidemiologia , Pancreatite/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Estudos Prospectivos , Esfinterotomia Endoscópica/métodos , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto Jovem
15.
World J Emerg Surg ; 14: 35, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31346347

RESUMO

Background: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) for patients with traumatic torso hemorrhagic shock is available to keep a minimum level of circulatory status as a bridge to definitive therapy. However, the trajectory for placement of REBOA in the aorta has not yet been clearly defined. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study in the two tertiary critical care and emergency center from December 2014 to October 2018. A total of 28 patients who underwent focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) were studied via contrast computed tomography (CT), and 27 were analyzed. Results: We divided patients into two groups based on our CT findings. The REBOA deflate group included 16 patients, and the inflate group included 11 patients. The median trace value (interquartile range) of the blood vessel center line from the common femoral artery to the tip of REBOA (blood vessel length) and the length of REBOA itself from the common femoral artery to the tip of REBOA (REBOA insertion length) were 56.2 cm (54.5-57.2) and 55.2 cm (54.2-55.6), respectively (p < 0.0001) for the deflated group, and 51.4 cm (42.1-56.6) and 50.3 cm (42.3-55.0) (p = 0.594), respectively, for the inflated group. Conclusions: If REBOA was deflated, it was placed 1.0 cm longer than the insertion length of REBOA catheter itself, but that was not the case when inflating REBOA. The individual difference was large to the extent that the balloon inflated and the extent to which the balloon was pushed back toward the caudal depending on the degree of blood pressure. Further studies would be needed to validate the study findings.


Assuntos
Pontos de Referência Anatômicos , Aorta/anatomia & histologia , Oclusão com Balão/métodos , Cateterismo/métodos , Adulto , Oclusão com Balão/normas , Cateterismo/normas , Estudos de Coortes , Procedimentos Endovasculares/métodos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/normas , Feminino , Humanos , Japão , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ressuscitação/métodos , Ressuscitação/normas , Estudos Retrospectivos
16.
Am J Crit Care ; 28(4): 290-298, 2019 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31263012

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Indwelling urinary and vascular catheters are a common cause of health care-associated infections. Interventions designed to reduce catheter use can be ineffective if they are not integrated into the workflow and communication streams of busy clinicians. OBJECTIVES: To characterize communication barriers between physicians and nurses and to understand how these barriers affect appropriate use and removal of indwelling urinary and vascular catheters. METHODS: Individual and small-group semistructured interviews were conducted with physicians and nurses in a progressive care unit of an academic hospital. Common themes were identified, analyzed, and then organized using a conceptual framework of contextual barriers to communication: organizational, cognitive, and social complexity. RESULTS: Several barriers to communication between physicians and nurses contributed to inappropriate use and delayed removal of catheters. Workflow misalignment between clinicians was a barrier associated with organizational complexity, issues with electronic medical records and pagers were associated with cognitive complexity, and strained relationships between clinicians and rigid hierarchies were associated with social complexity. CONCLUSIONS: Communication is contextual, and improving physician-nurse communication about appropriate catheter use may require innovations that address the identified contextual barriers.


Assuntos
Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/organização & administração , Cateterismo/enfermagem , Barreiras de Comunicação , Relações Médico-Enfermeiro , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/normas , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Cateterismo/normas , Cateteres de Demora , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/organização & administração , Humanos , Relações Interpessoais , Entrevistas como Assunto , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Fluxo de Trabalho
17.
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol ; 32(3): 263-267, 2019 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30985339

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: As the application of a test dose after epidural catheter insertion in obstetrics has recurrently been associated with serious adverse events affecting both maternal and foetal outcomes, the question whether to test or not remains a controversial issue. RECENT FINDINGS: Present guidelines do not provide clear recommendations in this regard and several recent surveys indicate a heterogeneity in clinical routine. SUMMARY: Physiological alterations during pregnancy and labour restrict the use and also the validity of traditional test agents. Epinephrine is not appropriate to detect a vascular insertion in labour and the application of a local anaesthetic test dose may lead to dose-dependent fatal consequences should the catheter be intrathecal, due to an increased sensitivity in parturients. Given the current practice of opioid-amended-low-concentration epidurals, the waiving of a test dose results at worst in a failed epidural, a stark contrast to the potentially severe to fatal complications of a 'traditional' test dose. Hence, an originally preventive measure providing potentially more harm than the consequences of the situation aimed to prevent, should not be recommended. A simple fractionated administration of the initial analgesic dose seems reasonable though.


Assuntos
Analgesia Epidural/métodos , Analgesia Obstétrica/métodos , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Cateterismo/métodos , Epinefrina/administração & dosagem , Analgesia Epidural/efeitos adversos , Analgesia Epidural/instrumentação , Analgesia Epidural/normas , Analgesia Obstétrica/efeitos adversos , Analgesia Obstétrica/instrumentação , Analgesia Obstétrica/normas , Anestésicos Locais/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo/instrumentação , Cateterismo/normas , Cateteres/efeitos adversos , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Espaço Epidural , Epinefrina/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções Epidurais/efeitos adversos , Injeções Epidurais/instrumentação , Injeções Epidurais/métodos , Injeções Epidurais/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Gravidez
18.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 59: 158-166, 2019 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31009720

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Almost 80% of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) initiate dialysis via a central venous catheter (CVC). CVCs are associated with multiple complications and a high cost of care. The purpose of our project is to determine the impact of early cannulation arteriovenous grafts (ECAVGs) on quality of care and costs. METHODS: The dialysis access modality, complications, secondary interventions, hospital outcomes, and detailed costs were tracked for 397 sequential patients who underwent access creation between July 2014 and October 2018. Complications were grouped into deep vein thrombosis, line infections, sepsis, pneumothorax, and other. Secondary interventions included angioplasty, angioplasty and stent grafting, thrombectomy, surgical revision, and explantation. Hospital outcomes included length of stay, inpatient mortality, 30-day readmission, and discharge disposition. Costs included supplies, medications, laboratory tests, labor, and other direct costs. All variables were measured at the time of the index procedure, 30 days, 90 days, 180 days, 270 days, 1 year, 18 months, and 2 years. RESULTS: There were 131 patients who underwent arteriovenous fistula (AVF) and 266 who received ECAVG for dialysis access. The total cost of care per patient was $17,523 for AVF and $5,894 for ECAVG at 1 year (P < 0.01). Primary-assisted patency for AVF was 49.3% versus 81.4% for ECAVG (P = 0.027), and secondary-assisted patency for AVF was 63.8% versus 85.4% for ECAVG at 1 year (P = 0.011). There was a survival advantage for ECAVGs at 1 year (78.6% for AVF vs 85.0% for ECAVG, P = 0.034). Patients who received ECAVG had fewer CVC days (2.3% vs 19.1% for AVF, P < 0.001), fewer complications (1.6% vs. 21.5% for AVF, P < 0.001), and fewer secondary interventions (17.0% vs 52.5% for AVF, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study on patients with ESRD to report detailed outcomes and cost analysis as it relates to AVF versus ECAVG. ECAVGs have an advantage over AVFs due to lower overall cost and better clinical outcomes at 1 year. Implementation of an urgent start dialysis access program centered around ECAVGs may help achieve the national goal of better health care at a lower cost for patients with ESRD.


Assuntos
Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica , Cateterismo , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Diálise Renal , Enxerto Vascular , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/economia , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/mortalidade , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/normas , Cateterismo/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo/economia , Cateterismo/mortalidade , Cateterismo/normas , Redução de Custos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/economia , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/terapia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitalização , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/diagnóstico , Falência Renal Crônica/economia , Falência Renal Crônica/mortalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos , Diálise Renal/economia , Diálise Renal/mortalidade , Diálise Renal/normas , Retratamento , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Enxerto Vascular/efeitos adversos , Enxerto Vascular/economia , Enxerto Vascular/mortalidade , Enxerto Vascular/normas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...